<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Wharton &#187; opinion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/tag/opinion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk</link>
	<description>There Is Always A Theory: politics, anarchy, religion, atheism and science. now with poetry!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:24:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Anonymous, Wikileaks &amp; Arabic Cyber Revolution: Cause</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2011/02/anonymous-wikileaks-arabic-cyber-revolutio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2011/02/anonymous-wikileaks-arabic-cyber-revolutio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 15:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Synonymous</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Algeria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chanology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDoS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Economy Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dramatica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeweb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacktivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacktivist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurgency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactivist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jordan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leakspin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lebanon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low orbit ion canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lulz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mauritania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morocco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality. open internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open rights group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operation payback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saudi Arabia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sudan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[titstorm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tunisia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twittocracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/?p=405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anonymous Operation Payback Targets Opponents Of Wikileaks
Okay, so due to really badly timed server issues, I have not been able to blog during the latest developments of what is now being called the first global cyber-revolution (thanks to Roger Davies for helping me out!). As my last blog entry: Twittocracy, Interactivism, Hacktivism &#38; Cyber Anarchy: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style='float: left; margin-right: 10px; border: none;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=5455c4d48903a45a5bbe6f17df67d4d1&amp;default=http://a.random-image.net/synonymous/randomshockandawe.jpg' alt='No Gravatar' width=40 height=40/><h3>Anonymous Operation Payback Targets Opponents Of Wikileaks</h3>
<p>Okay, so due to really badly timed server issues, I have not been able to blog during the latest developments of what is now being called the first global cyber-revolution (thanks to <a title="Roger Davies" href="http://www.rogerdavies.com" target="_blank">Roger Davies</a> for helping me out!). As my last blog entry: <a title="My last blog on the subject of the internet revolution" href="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/10/twittocracy-interactivism-hacktivism-cyber-anarchy-cause/" target="_blank">Twittocracy, Interactivism, Hacktivism &amp; Cyber Anarchy: Cause</a> covered Operation Payback, it was a vendetta campaign against those attempting to censor online content based on copyright infringement. Those perpetrating the attacks were Anonymous, the mysterious hacktivist group behind the latest <a title="Article on CBC News &quot;Visa, MasterCard targeted by WikiLeaks allies&quot;" href="http://www.cbc.ca/consumer/story/2010/12/08/con-wikileaks-backlash.html" target="_blank">cyber protests against opponents of Wikileaks</a>.</p>
<p>At the end of last year, Wikileaks released the torrent of leaked American diplomatic cables they called <a title="Link to Wikileak's Cablegate viewer" href="http://213.251.145.96/cablegate.html" target="_blank">Cablegate</a>. To say that this prompted a lot of international reaction would be the understatement of this century. Most world leaders had something to say on the matter and the majority of it was not sounding too good for Wikileaks or its founder Julian Assange. The web server that Wikileaks was hosted on came under DDoS attacks, similar in style to those carried out by Anonymous during Operation Payback Is a Bitch: Save The Pirate Bay. Wikileaks then had its money supply cut off by Paypal, Visa, Mastercard and Amazon dropped hosting. Anonymous; as a hive collective, decided to leap into action. The public home pages of Visa, Paypal and Mastercard were targetted for DDoS by Operation Payback: Save Wikileaks, and <a title="An index of Wikileak's Cablegate mirror sites" href="http://wikileaks.ch/Mirrors.html" target="_blank">hundreds of alternate mirrors of the site's Cablegate Datatbase were spawned</a>.</p>
<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_PCC9yHY6Ew?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<h3>Anonymous Changes Tactics: Operation Leakspin</h3>
<p>The cyber protests in the form of DDoS caught the ever gazing eye of the worlds media and Anonymous got a lot of press attention, using this attention Anonymous launched into a new direction with a new campaign; Operation Leakspin. Operation Payback had successfully brought attention to the shameful acts of private corporations under the intimidation of the United Sates of America. More importantly it had won the support of the people of the internet for Wikileaks, and freedom of the press. With this heightened level of awareness, <a title="Operation Leakspin (Now known as Crowd Leaks)" href="http://crowdleaks.org/" target="_blank">Operation Leakspin</a> was to spread the contents of the leaked diplomatic cables virally; via social media sites like Twitter, Facebook and Youtube. Other spin off Anonymous Operations were Operation Blackout/Face-Off which encouraged people to replace their internet avatars with a plain black square, and Operation Paperstorm which encouraged people to print out and distribute paper flyers about Wikileaks and Operation Leakspin. A new hub site emerged as a centralised meeting -place for organisation of such <a title="AnonOps New Site for Anonymous Operations" href="http://anonops.ru/" target="_blank">Anonymous Operations</a> with resources such as web chat, IRC and forums.</p>
<h3>Wikileaks, Anonymous &amp; The Coming Arabic Cyber Revolution</h3>
<p>In the last two weeks, the internet; in particular, Twitter, Wikileaks  and Anonymous , have played a vital role in the on-going cyber revolution across the Arab world. Firstly in Tunisia, where internet censorship has been used to silence dissenting voices for a while, one incident sparked a wave of protests across the country. A single individual immolated himself publicly leading to days of protests, until the leader of Tunisia, Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, fled to Saudi Arabia. More recently since January 25th, Egypt has been awash with protests against their tyrannical dictator Muhammad Hosni Sayyid Mubarak. Over the last few days these protests have descended into violent chaos, as Mubarak attempts to cling onto power by inciting violence among his minority of supporters. At one point Mubarak was desperate enough to shut down the entire country's internet access, to try and end this burgeoning revolution. According to the latest news sources, Mubarak was no longer intending to run for re-election in September yet refused to step down as President.<strong> [UPDATE] </strong>Mubarak has now handed over power to his senior military leadership; who were instrumental in advising him to step aside at the behest of his people. The people of Egypt seem to have accepting this situation as an interim to a new democratic government, but have planned to hold a public demonstration for this Friday (18/02/2011), to garner public opinion on the progression of this process . <strong>[/UPDATE]</strong></p>
<p>As if inspired by the courage displayed by the brave Tunisian and Egyptian people;<a title="Wikipedia article on the Arab Protests" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010%E2%80%932011_Arab_world_protests" target="_blank"> similar protests have taken place across the Arab world</a>. Algeria, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, Libya, Iran, Jordan, Oman, Sudan, Morocco, Mauritania and even Saudi Arabia have all had incidents ranging from small protests to all out revolution. <a title="Anonymous and the global correction article on Al Jazeera" href="http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/02/201121321487750509.html" target="_blank">This democratic movement is largely driven through social media and the internet</a>, which is why net neutrality is so important globally. The open internet model is necessary to maintain the freedoms of expression of those who are oppressed. In those countries where oppression is most rampant, the internet is used as a means to silence dissent. The voices of freedom cry out to the internet and are silenced, but Anonymous, and other internet freedom groups have taken up the mantle of freedom of speech. These internet vigilantes or hacktivists, have provided services to such affected regions such as <a title="Google's Seak To Tweet service set up to enable Egyptian tweeters when their internet was cut off." href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/01/some-weekend-work-that-will-hopefully.html" target="_blank">Google's Speak to Tweet</a> or information on <a title="The Tor Project; A free proxy service to provide online anonymity" href="http://www.torproject.org/" target="_blank">proxies like Tor</a>.</p>
<h3>[UPDATE] (17/02/2011) Anonymous &amp; Wikileaks Versus The FBI &amp; HBGary [/UPDATE]</h3>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 580px"><a href="http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/2294/internetsanon.jpg"><img class="  " title="Open Letter from Anonymous to HBGary" src="http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/2294/internetsanon.jpg" alt="Open Letter from Anonymous to HBGary" width="570" height="557" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Open Letter from Anonymous to HBGary</p></div>
<p>In the recent weeks the<a title="Article about Anonymous PartyV&amp; FBI Raids across the USA on The Register" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/01/28/fbi_crackdown_on_anonymous/" target="_blank"> FBI in the USA </a>and<a title="Article on the Anonymous Police Raids in London on Digital Trends" href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/london-police-arrest-five-possible-anonymous-hackers/" target="_blank"> British Police</a> have arrested several "Members of Anonymous". The FBI hired a company called<a title="Article on Wikileaks, Anonymous, the FBI and HBGary on Wikileaks Central" href="http://wlcentral.org/node/1250" target="_blank"> HBGary</a> to infiltrate and gather intelligence on the group Anonymous. Their efforts did not go unnoticed by the more skilled hacktivists of the group, who proceeded to hack into HBGary's server. They replaced the home page with the above image, and leaked thousands of emails to and from the company.</p>
<p>It seems like the message from Anonymous is pretty clear; the world governments and organisations who seek to control the internet have three options now:</p>
<p><strong>A)</strong> Release all of your secret information in an organised fashion</p>
<p><strong>B)</strong> People inside your organisation feel compelled to leak the information and do so</p>
<p><strong>C)</strong> The extremist arm of the internet comes and takes all your secrets and leaks them into the public domain</p>
<p>Whatever the future holds, the internet is key not only to observing and predicting social change, but generating it.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.michaelwharton.co.uk%2F2011%2F02%2Fanonymous-wikileaks-arabic-cyber-revolutio%2F&amp;linkname=Anonymous%2C%20Wikileaks%20%26%23038%3B%20Arabic%20Cyber%20Revolution%3A%20Cause"><img src="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2011/02/anonymous-wikileaks-arabic-cyber-revolutio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twittocracy, Interactivism, Hacktivism &amp; Cyber Anarchy: Cause</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/10/twittocracy-interactivism-hacktivism-cyber-anarchy-cause/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/10/twittocracy-interactivism-hacktivism-cyber-anarchy-cause/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Synonymous</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always An Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chanology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDoS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Economy Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dramatica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeweb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacktivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacktivist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurgency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactivist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low orbit ion canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lulz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open rights group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operation payback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[titstorm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twittocracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world peace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What Is Going On With All Of This Internet Dramatica?
The internet is revolting. It is full of people, with radical ideas and it's hard to navigate the web without being directly exposed to other people's creative juices. Right now you are reading the thoughts and opinions of an individual adult European male called Michael Wharton, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style='float: left; margin-right: 10px; border: none;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=5455c4d48903a45a5bbe6f17df67d4d1&amp;default=http://a.random-image.net/synonymous/randomshockandawe.jpg' alt='No Gravatar' width=40 height=40/><h3>What Is Going On With All Of This Internet Dramatica?</h3>
<p>The internet is revolting. It is full of <em>people</em>, with <strong>radical </strong>ideas and it's hard to navigate the web without being directly exposed to other people's <strong><em><a title="Ultimate Internetage: Some of my favourite internets" href="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/ultimate-internetage/" target="_blank">creative juices</a></em></strong>. Right now you are reading the thoughts and opinions of an individual adult European male called Michael Wharton, who has strong "opinions" and "theories" about the world around him. <a title="One of my earlier blogs about the worrying spread of Internet Censorship" href="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/05/internet-censorship-cause/" target="_blank">The internet</a> is the only real forum for every literate, intelligent individual or organisations of like minded individuals to openly voice their views to the entire world (<em>except <strong><a title="Internet Censorship In The People's Republic Of China - Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_the_People's_Republic_of_China" target="_blank">China </a></strong>obviously</em>).</p>
<p>The internet has been successfully, and unsuccessfully, used as tool for <strong>political </strong>campaigning. A great example of this was the recent British election in which several successful <a title="My Twitter Account; you know you want to!" href="http://www.twitter.com/MikeSynonymous" target="_blank">Twitter </a>"#hashtag" campaigns went viral and may have contributed to the resultant hung parliament (well there is always a theory!). This shift towards a <a title="Twittocracy definition on Urban Dictionary" href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=twittocracy&amp;defid=5072796" target="_blank">Twittocracy</a> will have to retain its neutrality, especially with the huge <strong>budgets </strong>some parties have for <em><strong>online campaigns</strong></em>. <a title="Twitter Shuts Out Political Advertisers, For Now. (Article on ClickZ)" href="http://www.clickz.com/clickz/news/1736281/twitter-shuts-out-political-advertisers-for-now" target="_blank">Luckily, the people at Twitter have declared that, at least for now, they aren't promoting paid political trends and tweets</a></p>
<h3>Cool Story Bro! What Happen? Whose Responsible This?</h3>
<div id="attachment_43" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 235px"><a href="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/R2D2-Cat.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-43" title="R2D2 Cat" src="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/R2D2-Cat-225x300.jpg" alt="I'm in ur droid PWNING teh Sith!1!" width="225" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">R2D2 cat is in ur droid PWNING teh Sith!1!</p></div>
<p>Well, yeah, the internet used to be fun and frolics. It used to be <a title="I can has cheezburger? One of the first websites to spring up dedicated to cat macros and lolcats" href="http://icanhascheezburger.com/" target="_blank">Lolcats</a>, <a title="Rick Roll Youtube - Check out the fact that the original video has less hits than Rocketboom's explaiation." href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=rick+roll&amp;aq=3" target="_blank">Rick Astley</a>, <a title="Badgers Badgers badgers... Weebl's Stuff - Badgers and lot's more!" href="http://www.weebls-stuff.com/search/?q=badgers&amp;order=1" target="_blank">Badgers</a>, <a title="Lol no, it's not porn." href="http://deathball.net/notpron/" target="_blank">Porn </a>and <a title="...it has pie too! Weebl's Stuff" href="http://www.weebls-stuff.com/search/?q=pie&amp;order=1">Pies</a>, but now the internet is serious business. Internet activism (<em>or as <strong>I </strong>like to call it <strong><a title="Interactivism definition on Urban Dictionary" href="http://interactivism.urbanup.com/5261698" target="_blank">interactivism</a></strong><strong>!</strong></em>) has been observable for a while now, but in the recent months it has been going through a renaissance and surge in popularity. Sites dedicated to particular humanitarian causes have attracted support through their own means for years. Now with the advent of <a title="List of Humanitarian Interactivist causes on Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/MikeSynonymous/interactivism-causes" target="_blank">social media and social networking sites, these causes can be spread much faster and wider by their own supporters</a>, eliminating a lot of expense.</p>
<p>With this torrent of the masses flowing to these social networking services, like <a title="Michael Wharton on Twitter" href="http://www.twitter.com/MikeSynonymous" target="_blank">Twitter</a> and <a title="Michael Wharton on Facebook" href="http://www.facebook.com/michaelsynonymous" target="_blank">Facebook</a>, the spread of ideology and philosophy is incredibly easy. The ability for people to instantly share opinions and feelings with friends and strangers is a boon to most, but there are those who fear information overload. It's all down to personal choice, free will is essential on the internet.</p>
<h3>Interactivism, Twittocracy Fine; But WTF Is Hacktivism?</h3>
<p><a title="Hacktivism definiton on Urban Dictionary (not by me this time!)" rel="nofollow" href="http://hacktivism.urbanup.com/1948893" target="_blank">Hacktivism</a> is the <a title="Last Measure on Encyclopedia Dramatica" href="http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Last_Measure" target="_blank">last measure</a> of interactivism; when petitions and protests and hashtags don't work. There are many forms of hacktivism being carried out all the time; whether it's journalists using illegal techniques to garner information then posting to <a title="Wikileaks where there are no secrets and lies!" href="http://wikileaks.org/" target="_blank">Wikileaks</a>, or members of elite hacker groups organising online raids or exploits (sploits) of particular targets. Although the former is the most publicised recently due to Wikileaks getting better at what they do, and various personal attacks upon its founder, the latter is the fastest growing.</p>
<h3>Anonymous Hacktivism: Operation Payback Is A Bitch!</h3>
<div id="attachment_362" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 275px"><a href="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/OperationPayBackOpenLetterFromAnonymous.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-362" title="OperationPayBackOpenLetterFromAnonymous" src="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/OperationPayBackOpenLetterFromAnonymous-265x300.jpg" alt="Open Letter From Anonymous " width="265" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Open Letter From Anonymous Regarding Operation Payback</p></div>
<p><a title="Anonymous definition on Encyclopedia Dramatica" href="http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Anonymous" target="_blank">Anonymous</a> (so named due to their frequent use of message/image boards such as <a title="4Chan Home of the brave" href="http://www.4chan.org/" target="_blank">4chan </a>where most users post using the default username "<a title="Anonymous Defined by Moot in 4Chan's FAQ" href="http://www.4chan.org/faq#anonymous" target="_blank">Anonymous</a>") are now the <a title="An Open Letter From Anonymous (Check out the other related documents by the OP)" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/37746686/An-Open-Letter-from-Anonymous" target="_blank">self proclaimed last line of defence of the internet and self appointed guardians of net neutrality</a>. They hide their personal identities to strengthen their group integrity, as an idea is impossible to destroy. <a title="Very well put together blogs about Anonymous and Cyber Protests" href="http://pandalabs.pandasecurity.com/category/cyber-protest/" target="_blank">Anonymous</a> have also been successful in many past instances of hacktivism aimed at various nefarious parties; from Operation Chanology against the church of Scientology, to Operation Titstorm/Freeweb against the DMCA and ACTA laws in Australia and USA. Their most recent campaign; <a title="Central Command for Operation Payback Is A Bitch; Caution! Proceed With CAUTION! (formerly http://www.tieve.tk/ then http://leetbaka.com/tpb/ the sites keep getting taken down)" href="http://anonops.net/" target="_blank">Operation Payback Is A Bitch</a>! the main <a title="Latest organised raids by Anonymous from The Register" href="http://search.theregister.co.uk/?q=4chan+anonymous+payback" target="_blank">targets </a>have been law firms (such as ACS:Law)  based in Europe and the UK, <a title="ACS Law and how they weakened their own stance on Copyright Law enforcement." href="http://www.rogerdavies.com/2010/10/acs-law-digital-economy-act/" target="_blank">law firms who have been encroaching on the personal freedoms of many innocent citizens</a>. The legitimacy of these <a title="Open discussion document on PiratePad" href="http://piratepad.net/smMc6fpgb8" target="_blank">targets </a>is debatable, but it is undeniable that in order to catch a copyright infringer, they have and will infringe all of our human rights. Anonymous have also aimed the <a title="Low Orbit Ion Canon definition on Encyclopedia Dramatica" href="http://encyclopediadramatica.com/LOIC" target="_blank">Low Orbit Ion Canon</a> at the <a title="Operation Payback is a Bitch: Hactivism at the dawn of Copyright Controversies (Article on Alphaville Herald)" href="http://alphavilleherald.com/2010/10/operation-payback-is-a-bitch-hactivism-at-the-dawn-of-copyright-controversies.html" target="_blank">Ministry of Sound website along with the RIAA, the MPAA</a> and <a title="Anonymous Versus Gene Simmons on Arstechnica" href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/10/gene-simmons-vs-anonymous-whos-the-bigger-asshole.ars" target="_blank">Gene Simmons</a> as part of <a title="Another Insight into Operation Payback on the Blogosphere" href="http://www.rachellemitchell.com/2010/10/censorship-and-cyber-wars/" target="_blank">Operation Payback</a>. Future plans for <a title="Download the Low Orbit Ion Canon TODAY! (Or don't, it's what some might call a &quot;Cyber weapon&quot;.)" href="http://github.com/NewEraCracker/LOIC/downloads" target="_blank">DDoS</a> targets are discussed in a fluid manner on <a title="IRC Chat channel on which anonymous is discussing their plans democratically. (With lots of rudeness)." href="http://anonops.net/irc.php" target="_blank">IRC</a> channels and <a title="The place where new targets are discussed by participants of Operation Payback" href="http://808chan.org/tpb/" target="_blank">voted on democratically</a> on affiliated Operation Payback sites. There is actually a precedent for this type of cyber-protest, back in 2004 the internet group <a title="The about page for Lycos" href="http://info.lycos.com/" target="_blank">Lycos</a> launched; <a title="Article On the BBC News website about the Make Love Not Spam campaign by Lycos" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4061375.stm" target="_blank">Make Love Not Spam</a> a campaign against internet spammers using a similar DDoS method. News of these <a title="List of links to online news sources referring to Operation Payback" href="http://www.anonops.net/media.php" target="_blank">Operation Payback</a> attacks does keep coming from certain affiliated sources such as <a title="Article about latest attack on the UK's copyright office on Torrent Freak" href="http://torrentfreak.com/anonymous-takes-out-uks-intellectual-property-office-website-101017/" target="_blank">Torrent Freak</a>, but mainstream TV news sources (especially in the UK) have, at best been practically ignoring it, at worst misreporting it completely. There is always a theory that this is intentional, to prevent more people joining the cause and quell the <a title="Operation Payback take down the UK government's official Copyright Website IPO" href="http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1794069/operation-payback-takes-uk-ip-office" target="_blank">fire storm</a> coming from the internet. This will not work. When dealing with an internet phenomenon, there is no real way to keep it quiet if it is a popular enough idea. The latest news from the front is promising, as a result of ACS-Law's inability to keep data private, <a title="BT delete user data over privacy fears - Slyck (Via Digg, so, Digg it won't you?!)" href="http://digg.com/news/technology/slyck_news_bt_deletes_records_of_20_000_suspected_file_sharers_ministry_of_sound_pissed" target="_blank">BT have recently deleted user data, much to the annoyance of the Ministry Of Sound.</a></p>
<h3>Anonymous ACTA Video From The Operation Payback Site</h3>
<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gbqC8BnvVHQ?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<h3>How Does Interactivism Lead To Twittocracy / Cyber Anarchy?</h3>
<p>Quite simply put, we are coming to a very crucial point in the development of humanity. We have several paths ahead of us, and we must exercise our free will and choose the right one (in my opinion <a title="Michael Wharton: Anarchy is inevitable!" href="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/03/anarchy-in-the-uk-theory/" target="_blank">Anarchy </a>is hard to avoid). Down one could lead to a dystopian future with information being tightly controlled like George Orwell's 1984. Down another path we might find peace and unity through the free sharing of ideas and free expression of creativity. Maybe I'm being idealistic, but I'd rather live in a world where all <em>my </em>information is in the public domain than one where we are being lied to constantly and refused information.</p>
<p>The choices are being made now, by our politicians, but there are other forces at work other than plain old politics. Money is a major factor in the information war, the others are power and control. Artists and those who create digital media are not the primary benefactors of their work. The big production companies and corporate bosses make so much more than the actual creators that it sickens most people. We find it harder and harder to justify why these people deserve to live in luxury while we live in fear of repossession. This hacktivism will not be the last shot fired as long as the freedom and neutrality of the internet is threatened still. The anonymous legion will keep firing their lasers until they achieve great justice, maybe we will praise them as honoured brethren.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.michaelwharton.co.uk%2F2010%2F10%2Ftwittocracy-interactivism-hacktivism-cyber-anarchy-cause%2F&amp;linkname=Twittocracy%2C%20Interactivism%2C%20Hacktivism%20%26%23038%3B%20Cyber%20Anarchy%3A%20Cause"><img src="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/10/twittocracy-interactivism-hacktivism-cyber-anarchy-cause/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science Versus Religion: Shoop</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/08/science-versus-religion-shoop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/08/science-versus-religion-shoop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 00:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Synonymous</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Shoop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Dawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shoop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Hawking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahweh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/?p=286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Science Versus Religion: Shoop Da Whoop!

The age old battle of Science Versus Religion has been raging on since the invention of God. Obviously Science came first, then some upstart developed the concept of worship and deities.
Here I have represented the Scientific method with a "Holy Trinity" of scientific legends of our time. Charles Darwin with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style='float: left; margin-right: 10px; border: none;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=5455c4d48903a45a5bbe6f17df67d4d1&amp;default=http://a.random-image.net/synonymous/randomshockandawe.jpg' alt='No Gravatar' width=40 height=40/><h3>Science Versus Religion: Shoop Da Whoop!</h3>
<div id="attachment_292" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 402px"><a href="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Darkwings-Versus-Yahweh-Science-versus-Religion.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-292   " title="Darkwings-Versus-Yahweh (Science versus Religion)" src="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Darkwings-Versus-Yahweh-Science-versus-Religion.png" alt="Science Versus Religion: Darkwings Versus Yahweh" width="392" height="293" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Science Versus Religion - Darkwings Versus Yahweh: Shoop       CLICK ON IMAGE FOR ORIGINAL SIZE</p></div>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p>The age old battle of Science Versus Religion has been raging on since the invention of God. Obviously Science came first, then some upstart developed the concept of worship and deities.</p>
<p>Here I have represented the Scientific method with a "Holy Trinity" of scientific legends of our time. Charles Darwin with his theory of Evolution, Stephen Hawking with his theory of the Big Bang, and of course Richard Dawkins with his tireless efforts to promote secular, scientific, logical, reasoning and free thinking amongst the Religious community.</p>
<p>God / Yahweh is represented by an image I found: <a href="http://puffin.creighton.edu/jesuit/andre/yahweh.html">http://puffin.creighton.edu/jesuit/andre/yahweh.html</a> All glory to the original artist!</p>
<p>I really liked the anthropomorphising of the Hebrew lettering. I thought it fit the scheme well.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.michaelwharton.co.uk%2F2010%2F08%2Fscience-versus-religion-shoop%2F&amp;linkname=Science%20Versus%20Religion%3A%20Shoop"><img src="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/08/science-versus-religion-shoop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Freedom: A Forum For Internet Activism In The UK</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/07/your-freedom-internet-activism-uk-political-orum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/07/your-freedom-internet-activism-uk-political-orum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 19:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Synonymous</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always An Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacktivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacktivist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactivist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twittocracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world peace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Yesterday on the first of July Your Freedom was launched by the coalition Liberal Democrat/Conservative government. It seems that Nick Clegg is at the lead of the project, spearheading a new avenue of internet political interactivity. Over the last couple of years, there have been more and more politically charged social networking sites springing up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style='float: left; margin-right: 10px; border: none;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=5455c4d48903a45a5bbe6f17df67d4d1&amp;default=http://a.random-image.net/synonymous/randomshockandawe.jpg' alt='No Gravatar' width=40 height=40/><p><a href="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/your-freedom.PNG"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-259" title="Your Freedom" src="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/your-freedom-300x226.PNG" alt="Your Freedom" width="300" height="226" /></a></p>
<p>Yesterday on the first of July <a title="Your Freedom - Open Political Social Networking Forum" href="http://yourfreedom.hmg.gov.uk" target="_blank">Your Freedom</a> was launched by the coalition Liberal Democrat/Conservative government. It seems that Nick Clegg is at the lead of the project, spearheading a new avenue of internet political interactivity. Over the last couple of years, there have been more and more politically charged social networking sites springing up on all bands of the political spectrum. Several of these were single policy sites, pushing a particular agenda, some were more broadly focused with a particular political slant. In the UK, the government is attempting to give all of these disparate viewpoints a forum for debate and discussion of ideas.</p>
<p>Although it's still <a title="Your Freedom Is Down?" href="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/07/your-freedom-new-government-service-down/" target="_self">a little shaky</a> due to the fact that demand for the service is so much higher than anticipated, the functionality of the front end more than makes up for it. There's an intuitive tagging system, which allows all users to add tags to all campaigns, and all users can leave comments too. It's like we are truly entering a state of Twittocracy (well there is always a theory...), a society shaped by the majority, with their collective opinions being aggregated automatically through what I like to call Interactivism (maybe Hacktivism?) which is basically a marriage of internet and activism.</p>
<p>A number of campaigns are theoretically sound, but the methodology is lacking (poor spelling and grammar...). A great many campaigns are identical to others and sevceral recurring themes have sprung up; such as repealing the Digital Economy Act and the Legalization of Cannabis.</p>
<p>I believe that this proactive platform for public political promotion is pretty provocative. It is probably paramount to protect personal privacy and post (okay, enough alliteration...) anonymously to begin with. Compared with <a title="Petition The Prime Minister at Number 10 Downing Street" href="http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/" target="_blank">Petition The PM at Number 10</a> it is definitely an improvement in that it is much less patronising.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.michaelwharton.co.uk%2F2010%2F07%2Fyour-freedom-internet-activism-uk-political-orum%2F&amp;linkname=Your%20Freedom%3A%20A%20Forum%20For%20Internet%20Activism%20In%20The%20UK"><img src="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/07/your-freedom-internet-activism-uk-political-orum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Ode To War: Poem by Michael Wharton</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/06/an-ode-to-war-poem-by-michael-wharton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/06/an-ode-to-war-poem-by-michael-wharton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Synonymous</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[There Is Always An Ode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad idea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cruelty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darwin award]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humanist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pantheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weapon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world peace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Ode To War: A Poem by Michael Wharton

You are a weapon in the war against peace,
They use your fear to control your actions,
On either side they produce vile propaganda,
Take care to examine the motives of factions.
Why fight at all, what is your main objective?
Power, money, control, cruelty and corruption,
Power over the minds of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style='float: left; margin-right: 10px; border: none;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=5455c4d48903a45a5bbe6f17df67d4d1&amp;default=http://a.random-image.net/synonymous/randomshockandawe.jpg' alt='No Gravatar' width=40 height=40/><h3>An Ode To War: A Poem by Michael Wharton</h3>
<p><br style="clear:both" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">You are a weapon in the war against peace,<br />
They use your fear to control your actions,<br />
On either side they produce vile propaganda,<br />
Take care to examine the motives of factions.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Why fight at all, what is your main objective?<br />
Power, money, control, cruelty and corruption,<br />
Power over the minds of the people and opinions,<br />
Money is the constant for supply and production.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Control over land mass, of which there is finite,<br />
Cruelty to those who disagree with your virtues.<br />
Corruption of the virtues you pretend to uphold,<br />
Evolution's Nature's job we have to let her choose.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">We are at peace with war so it seems in the media,<br />
The news is just numbers now, in bite size chunks.<br />
Between targeted product informational programming,<br />
Sold to you by plastic chicks and shredded hunks.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="560" height="340" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/AuLoOBt_ZR0&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1?hd=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="340" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/AuLoOBt_ZR0&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1?hd=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>This may be very short and succinct but the topic and subject matter are distasteful and abhorrent, so I kept it concise. I didn't really have to include details of war or its atrocities, as we are all very much aware of the obvious physical realities. I wanted to keep it simple, as war often is; a struggle for resources at the cost of human life.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.michaelwharton.co.uk%2F2010%2F06%2Fan-ode-to-war-poem-by-michael-wharton%2F&amp;linkname=An%20Ode%20To%20War%3A%20Poem%20by%20Michael%20Wharton"><img src="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/06/an-ode-to-war-poem-by-michael-wharton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Censorship: Cause</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/05/internet-censorship-cause/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/05/internet-censorship-cause/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 13:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Synonymous</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Bad Idea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always An Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unsorted Assortments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chanology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church of google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEBill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Economy Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Economy Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacktivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacktivist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactivist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roger davies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texting and walking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twittocracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world peace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Internet Censorship is generally a bad idea, but this is a cause, join the fight to stop your internet being filtered.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style='float: left; margin-right: 10px; border: none;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=5455c4d48903a45a5bbe6f17df67d4d1&amp;default=http://a.random-image.net/synonymous/randomshockandawe.jpg' alt='No Gravatar' width=40 height=40/><h3>Internet Censorship: The Internet Is Under Attack?</h3>
<p>According to many key sources of internet trends, the recent governmental seizure of control over the internet has been perceived as a threat to global freedom. The internet culture has flourished from what once was the domain of the knowledgeable few, to what is often called "Web 2.0"; user generated and driven content, shared and open to all interactively and easily. Nowadays, most people between their childhood and retirement age will spend time online regularly. They do so to catch up on the latest news, kill time watching funny videos of cats, keep in touch with long lost friends and relatives, etc... The list of activities people perform regularly online is pretty endless, as new applications of the internet are coming along every day. Some of the things people do online are currently illegal, in quite a few countries, and for years now the governments of those (often developed) countries have been trying to figure out how to enforce laws on the internet. From copyright infringement to "Indecent Pornography", it has been a game of cat and mouse, as technology on both sides is developed to outsmart the other.</p>
<p>We were all made aware of this arms race when sites like Napster and  The Pirate Bay were legally challenged, when news of sting operations on paedophile and terrorist networks hit the papers. We were glad of our Government's action against those who would harm or way of life. Now however, it is our governments themselves who are threatening our way of life; in a new development in this arms race, we the people are being targeted with internet censorship.</p>
<p>The <a title="Anti Counterfeiting Trade Agreement" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Counterfeiting_Trade_Agreement" target="_blank">ACTA</a> has been implemented in several "Freedom Loving" countries such as Australia, America, and now the United Kingdom has followed suit with the <a title="The Digital Economy Bill And How It Will Fail! (and affect YOU!)" href="http://www.rogerdavies.com/2010/04/digital-economy-bill-farce-and-how-uk-government-will-fail/" target="_blank">Digital Economy Bill </a>(The DEBill is now The<a title="What a Digital Economy really is..." href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_economy" target="_blank"> Digital Economy</a> <a title="The UK Digital Economy Act: Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Economy_Act" target="_blank">Act </a>since it was pushed through parliament... shouldn't have dragged my feet writing this blog...). Now we have internet censorship, blacklisted websites and filtered content.</p>
<h3>Internet Censorship: Spreading The Word!</h3>
<h3><a title="Internet Censorship Youtube Video Playlist by Michael Wharton (MikeSynonymous)" href="http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=AA827F25F996B708" target="_blank">Internet Censorship Youtube Video Playlist:</a></h3>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/p/AA827F25F996B708&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/p/AA827F25F996B708&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>So as far as I can tell, the internet is going to become more strictly controlled, surveilled, filtered and censored worldwide. Copyright piracy, inappropriate porn and terrorist communication are simply convenient distractions, so that dissent can be monitored and controlled. If any of the videos in the internet censorship playlist are removed, or if you can no longer gain access to this page then you will know that I was right.</p>
<p>Since the development of the internet, it has been used to express opinions and information freely with the rest of the world. Don't allow this tool to be used to gag and control you, speak out against this right infringement. Several organisations have interactivist campaigns you can join to let your voice be heard; <a title="The Electronic Frontier Foundation Anti Internet Censorship Campaign" href="http://w2.eff.org/br/" target="_blank">The EFF</a>, <a title="The Open Rights Group Online Free Speech Campaign" href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/" target="_blank">The ORG</a>, <a title="38 Degrees Online Liberal Activist group" href="http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/2010/03/19/10000-condemn-the-digital-economy-bill/" target="_blank">38 Degrees</a> and of course <a title="Project Freeweb - Started by Australian members of Anonymous" href="http://projectfreeweb.org/" target="_blank">Project Freeweb</a>.</p>
<p>If we do nothing, we are in very real danger of losing access to the "real" internet like other less than free countries with more extreme levels of internet censorship ( an obvious example is the People's Republic of China (oh no, I guess that my site's blocked there now...)). Internet superstars such as <a title="Tim Berners Lee - Internet Superstar!" href="http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/" target="_blank">Tim Berners Lee</a> and<a title="Declaration of Independence of the Internet by John Perry Barlow of the Electronic Frontiers Foundation (EFF)" href="https://projects.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html" target="_blank"> John Perry Barlow</a> have declared their opposition to internet censorship. Internet deity <a title="Official Google Blog on Internet Freedom" href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/greater-transparency-around-government.html" target="_blank">Google</a> have spoken out against the global trend towards internet censorship measures and the state controlling the web. Google even released this<a title="How much is YOUR government censoring the internet?" href="http://www.google.com/governmentrequests/" target="_blank"> handy tool</a> to see how much your internet content is being filtered. We have to all stand together and say "No, we DO NOT WANT internet censorship, filtered content or our internet to be arbitrarily cut off!". Of course as with anything online, you have an overwhelming choice of mediums for interactivism to convey such a message!</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.michaelwharton.co.uk%2F2010%2F05%2Finternet-censorship-cause%2F&amp;linkname=Internet%20Censorship%3A%20Cause"><img src="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/05/internet-censorship-cause/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anarchy, In The UK?: Theory</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/03/anarchy-in-the-uk-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/03/anarchy-in-the-uk-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Synonymous</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always An Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti capitalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedomist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacktivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacktivist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactivist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world peace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anarchy - A Chaotic Mayhem Surely?
Anarchy is inevitable, that much is known for certain, or at least a wide held belief. Where can one draw order from Chaos? Well according to Chaos Theory, patterns emerge organically in nature and are much more stable than those that we have artificially created. Take this principal from physics [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style='float: left; margin-right: 10px; border: none;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=5455c4d48903a45a5bbe6f17df67d4d1&amp;default=http://a.random-image.net/synonymous/randomshockandawe.jpg' alt='No Gravatar' width=40 height=40/><h3>Anarchy - A Chaotic Mayhem Surely?</h3>
<div id="attachment_205" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 170px"><a href="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/is-anarchy-the-future.PNG"><img class="size-full wp-image-205 " title="Or is it simply the destination?" src="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/is-anarchy-the-future.PNG" alt="Or is it simply the destination?" width="160" height="109" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Is Anarchy The Way Forward?</p></div>
<p>Anarchy is inevitable, that much is known for certain, or at least a wide held belief. Where can one draw order from Chaos? Well according to Chaos Theory, patterns emerge organically in nature and are much more stable than those that we have artificially created. Take this principal from physics to biological evolution and you have the origin of Species Theory being proven. Take it further to sociology and politics and you have Anarchy emerging as the only sensible logical, rational state of Utopia in which we can have world peace. Okay, it's a bit of a leap of faith, although faith is belief in the absence of evidence, this would require belief in the overwhelming presence of irrefutable and undeniable evidence.  Money is the deciding point; throughout history, goods have been traded according to both the effort of acquisition and scarcity. When money began to flourish as a means of fair exchange, the problems really started. It stopped being fair for a start, where there is somebody making money, in every case, there is somebody off of whose back that money was made. Financial and managerial hierarchies formed, allegiances were made according to financial benefits to the parties involved. In my opinion, Religion must have facilitated money's rise to power due to self interest (that's if money wasn't the idea of some form of Religion...). There are many interactivist organisations dedicated to Freeing us from the tyranny of money, such as <a title="Really Really Free market In San Francisco" href="http://www.reallyreallyfree.org/" target="_blank">The Really Really Free Market</a>, <a title="Buy Nothing Day United Kingdom" href="http://www.buynothingday.co.uk/" target="_blank">Buy Nothing Day</a>, the <a title="The Freeconomy Community: Money free sustainable living movement." href="http://www.justfortheloveofit.org/home" target="_blank">Freeconomy Community</a> or even Craigslist and all of the Freecycle community. These are only examples of the myriad of NPOs (None Profit Organisations) trying to make the world a fairer nicer place without financial divisions through interactisism.</p>
<h3>What does this brief history of Politics mean?</h3>
<p>Well in short, it means that until Religion and money are ultimately removed from society, Anarchy will always have strong opposition from those who currently have power. Those with political power who may somehow agree with the ideals of Anarchy, have no real power to promote it as a means to a utopian end. There is no way to democratically vote for a state of Anarchy, I see this as wrong and almost dictatorial. In states where there is an entry for <a title="Wikipedia - None Of The Above" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/None_of_the_above" target="_blank">none of the above</a> candidates in the ballot, this is simply taken as a protest vote and not a meaningful dissolution of parliament option.</p>
<h3>Technology Is Evolving Towards Anarchy</h3>
<p>Obsolete is the technology of mining and burning fossil fuels that do not replenish. We now know that the Carbon Dioxide released is warming the planet to the point where methane deposits in the world oceans could melt ending much of the life on this planet incredibly quickly. This is alarming as the last time this happened it wiped out 95% of all life on earth. Science and technology are key to preventing this potential apocalypse, not one particular technology or science, but an advanced amalgamation of all of the latest developments in green energy and manufacture. The hydrogen fuel cell is set to replace the internal combustion engine as a means of effectively powering our road and aerial vehicles. Soon enough the means of producing the Hydrogen will be available cheaply from wind and solar energy in and around the homestead. At this stage an individual dwelling will have no need for energy from the national grid and will become self sufficient and green. Other technologies set to influence the political arena are geothermal energy, high rise farms, nano-scale replication and manufacturing (essentially the ultimate form of recycling, put in your old phone, it gets taken apart to its molecules and reassembled get the latest model printed out), and of course stem cell research and gene therapy (potentially curing deadly diseases like cancer and HIV).  My interpretation of the effect these technologies will have on humanity is not unique to me. Many libertarian Freedomists or advocates of political and economic Anarchy believe that these technologies will bring about an end to money's totalitarian reign over us. These technologies are a decade, or less, away but in my opinion they could be here sooner if we change our combined political and financial attitude. There are lots of examples of projects like <a title="The Venus Project - A bold, new direction for humanity" href="http://www.thevenusproject.com/" target="_blank">The Venus Project</a> and even mainstream efforts like the <a title="Greensburg GreenTown Rebuilding a town after natural disaster, but building it greener!" href="http://www.greensburggreentown.org" target="_blank">Greensburg GreenTown Project</a> , these projects could be done faster and better if money were not a factor in the decision making process.</p>
<h3>How Can I Get Involved In Advocating Anarcho-Capitalist-Libertarianism?</h3>
<p>My Utopian vision of the future, is somewhat identical to the world John Lennon described so vividly in his most famous song; Imagine. The journey from here to there is fraught with perilous downfalls, with temptations for greed and self service. To ensure we make it safely we need to ensure we do not lose our footing and slip back into a possessive consumerist culture. Short of what Anarchists all over the world are already doing (which in my opinion only gives credence to the consensus of the masses that we are all a bunch of violent destructive simpletons who hate the police), you can stop consuming as much and try to become greener with regards to technology. Become part of a movement, whatever one you like, that is doing something that you can see is shifting paradigms towards a utopian vision. Or something like that.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.michaelwharton.co.uk%2F2010%2F03%2Fanarchy-in-the-uk-theory%2F&amp;linkname=Anarchy%2C%20In%20The%20UK%3F%3A%20Theory"><img src="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/03/anarchy-in-the-uk-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Name The Decade! Teenties? Tweens? Eleventies!</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/01/name-the-decade-teenties-eleventies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/01/name-the-decade-teenties-eleventies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Synonymous</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always An Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unsorted Assortments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1337]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cultural phenomenon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eleventies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eleventy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eleventyone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael wharton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[millennium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nostalgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social consciousness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is in a Name? 1910 -2000 Back In The Decade!
Over the past hundred years, it has become more and more popular a cultural phenomenon to name the decade. There was the Roaring Twenties, the Thirties and Forties, Fifties and Swinging Sixties. The Seventies, Eighties and Naughty Nineties were relatively straightforward. Right up until the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style='float: left; margin-right: 10px; border: none;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=5455c4d48903a45a5bbe6f17df67d4d1&amp;default=http://a.random-image.net/synonymous/randomshockandawe.jpg' alt='No Gravatar' width=40 height=40/><h2>What is in a Name? 1910 -2000 Back In The Decade!</h2>
<p>Over the past hundred years, it has become more and more popular a cultural phenomenon to name the decade. There was the Roaring Twenties, the Thirties and Forties, Fifties and Swinging Sixties. The Seventies, Eighties and Naughty Nineties were relatively straightforward. Right up until the new millennium it took little imagination to perpetuate this new-found tradition.</p>
<p>Some kind of social genius, with a degree in semantics, came up with a name for the decade following the Millennium; The Noughties. It's not like it was entirely on the money (not many people say nought-one, nought-two etc...) but it was quirky and kitsch and it rolled of the tongue. That's what we need for this decade, something that sounds cool. It doesn't have to be massively accurate, just passably sensible. Oh, and it has to end in "ties", you know, to fit in with all of the other decades rhyming scheme.</p>
<h2>What Shall We Call This Decade 2010-2019 ?</h2>
<p>There are a few suggestions out there on the internet, and let's face it, that is where this will be decided. We have the "Teens", now obviously this doesn't come up to the standard of ending in "ties". We could add "ties" to "Teens" and get "Teenties", but that is a really unwieldy word, also it doesn't cover the period of 2010 to 2012 with the numbers ten through twelve not actually being classified as teens. We could take what we know so far to make a new word "Tenties", but that sounds really awkward and like a vague reference to camping. The list of examples in this ball park is fairly short so I might as well include all of them, here is the last runner up, "Tweenties" (shudder).</p>
<p>My favourite concept word for this occasion is definitely the "<a title="Eleventies on What The Trend" href="http://whatthetrend.com/trend/eleventies" target="_blank">Eleventies</a>", it may surprise you, as it seems to defy any definition itself, let alone as a defining term for this decade. My favour is spawned from the repeated utterances in the literary classic series Lord Of The Rings, and lead furthermore by the repeated references of the word such as "111EleventyOne!111!1!!" etc on <a title="From the 1337 community to those who refuse to stop mocking the 1337 community!" href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=eleventy" target="_blank">internet messaging boards due to its overuse in on-line gaming</a>. The word eleven (11) refers to the number between ten (10) and twelve (12), the word Eleventy refers to the number range of a hundred and ten (110) to a hundred and nineteen (119).</p>
<h2>Why Will Eleventies Work?</h2>
<p>I believe these factors; previous knowledge of the word amongst a large sub-culture (Examples of its use in context already found <a title="Own Life Blog - Eleventies used as reference to the decade repeatedly." href="http://ownlife.com.au/blog/?p=843" target="_blank">here </a>, <a title="Somebody else who came to the same conclusion on message board Bad Astronomy - It's going to be the Eleventies get over it." href="http://www.bautforum.com/off-topic-babbling/98746-will-twenty-ten-not-two-ten-3.html#post1654623" target="_blank">here </a>and <a title="Direct quote from Acting Premier Paul Lucas on ABC news where he refers to the forthcoming decade as the Eleventies" href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/12/31/2783587.htm" target="_blank">here</a>) and the numerical logistical applications of the word itself, will contribute to the word <a title="Eleventies on Urban Dictionary" href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Eleventies" target="_blank">Eleventies</a> becoming the defining term used for this decade.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.michaelwharton.co.uk%2F2010%2F01%2Fname-the-decade-teenties-eleventies%2F&amp;linkname=Name%20The%20Decade%21%20Teenties%3F%20Tweens%3F%20Eleventies%21"><img src="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/01/name-the-decade-teenties-eleventies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mirror, SIGNAL, manoeuvre: Cause</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2009/10/mirror-signal-manoeuvre-drivers-indicate-correctly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2009/10/mirror-signal-manoeuvre-drivers-indicate-correctly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Synonymous</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Bad Idea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always An Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad idea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangerous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangerous driving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darwin award]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driving on the phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inconsiderate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mirror SIGNAL manoeuvre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texting and driving]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why don't drivers indicate properly? Do younger drivers fall out of the habit because of other bad driving habits? Why is it essential to signal EVERY time?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style='float: left; margin-right: 10px; border: none;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=5455c4d48903a45a5bbe6f17df67d4d1&amp;default=http://a.random-image.net/synonymous/randomshockandawe.jpg' alt='No Gravatar' width=40 height=40/><h2>Why Don't Some Drivers Indicate Correctly?</h2>
<p>I am a humble pedestrian, occasional cyclist but never a driver, so maybe it will be hard for me to understand the effort involved in remembering to indicate. I know some of the Highway Code, I was thinking about taking my test some day, but the way some people drive just makes me think too much about dying at the hands of a moron. I <em>personally</em> find this off-putting.</p>
<p>Of all of the initial lessons one learns when mastering the art of driving, mirror, signal, manoeuvre is a mantra too quickly forgotten on the roads. Those flashing yellow lights are for warning <strong>all </strong>other road users of your intentions, those you are aware of<strong> and </strong>those you haven't seen. On many occasions, this negligence has lead to me being stood directly in front of a car making a turn towards me, while I was crossing the road, on one occasion it didn't quite stop in time and gave me a bump. What was really galling was the fact that these drivers seemed so indignant and defensive of the idea that it was their fault for not signalling.</p>
<p>Maybe it's a generational thing, in my experience younger drivers tend to be more guilty of failing to signal. Older drivers tend to indicate every time; my Dad for example indicates round car parks because it has become so second nature to him.  This leads me to believe that it may have something to do with falling out of the habit due to some form of encumbrance, such as not being able to indicate for some reason. I noticed that upon looking into the window of the cars that don't indicate, about a 30% were <strong>ON THE PHONE</strong>, 40% were sticking their left gear changing hand somewhere else (up their nose, on the gear lever, on their face, drinking HOT coffee, <strong>TEXTING!</strong>). At least another 20% were resting their right arm out the window, the other ten were miscellaneous in case you were wondering.</p>
<h2>What Can Pedestrians Do About It?</h2>
<p>I have personally confronted drivers about their failure to indicate or being on the phone, sometimes a simple dirty look is enough to evoke a look of shame and apology. Sometimes they get out of their car and harass you verbally for telling them how to drive, but the advantage of being a pedestrian is that I can walk away, they are making a journey of some kind and usually want to get along, <em>in </em>their car. Maybe if it was the norm for people to be openly critical of other's stupidity things would be better. As for now I am the one with a chip on my shoulder from being bumped over by a car driver in this situation.</p>
<p>Now I am finally blogging about it, maybe I can convince people of why it's important to signal at all times to get into the good habit. Mirror, SIGNAL, manoeuvre is not just for when you see other cars around, but all the time, for the people you don't see (like in your blind spot) too.</p>
<p>I started a <a title="Mirror, SIGNAL, Manoeuvre! Facebook Group" href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=80582113337" target="_blank">Facebook Group</a> about this after I nearly got hit again, and shouted at the middleaged lady driver only to get the finger for my wisdom. Please join it and invite your friends, it's open to all and only takes a minute!</p>
<p>In summation this current trend in bad driving could be due to many of the other bad driving factors I have seen, or it could be a phenomenon of its own. This does not matter, what really matters is that it stops being so prolific. We need to scold drivers with a simple phrase that will put them right back in the learners seat; Mirror, SIGNAL, Manoeuvre!</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.michaelwharton.co.uk%2F2009%2F10%2Fmirror-signal-manoeuvre-drivers-indicate-correctly%2F&amp;linkname=Mirror%2C%20SIGNAL%2C%20manoeuvre%3A%20Cause"><img src="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2009/10/mirror-signal-manoeuvre-drivers-indicate-correctly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox Pwns Internet Explorer: Opinion</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2009/09/firefox-pwns-internet-explorer-opinion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2009/09/firefox-pwns-internet-explorer-opinion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 18:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Synonymous</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always An Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been using Firefox as part of a minority for years, and now it appears we are in the MAJORITY! Mozilla Firefox is a better browser than Microsoft Internet Explorer: TRUEFACT!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style='float: left; margin-right: 10px; border: none;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=5455c4d48903a45a5bbe6f17df67d4d1&amp;default=http://a.random-image.net/synonymous/randomshockandawe.jpg' alt='No Gravatar' width=40 height=40/><p>As we all know, <strong>Microsoft </strong>have done their level best to completely distort the way you see the internet, for many years now.  Their browser, <strong>Internet Explorer</strong> (<em>a massive misnomer, as is not that great an explorer, it's the one that got lost on the way to the shops and was never heard from again as it couldn't understand the simple directions a kind stranger offered along the way!</em>), is written into Windows in such a way that everybody who uses a <strong>Microsoft Windows OS</strong> will at some point in their lives have had to use it, if only to download a <em>better </em>browser.</p>
<p>The rare occasions I <em>have </em>used <strong>IE </strong>in the past have indeed been to download better browsers, such as Firefox. I have only been using the internet comprehensively for the last five years, and I have used <strong>IE </strong>for a combined total of less than five minutes. I originally used it to download <strong>Opera</strong>, a fantastic free browser with many cool features like multi-tab browsing, session restore, password saving and of course, it's more secure than <strong>IE</strong>!</p>
<p>I used <strong>Opera </strong>for several months of my first exploits on the net, it was fast, reliable and rarely crashed. I found out about other alternative browsers, reports were split on them all, except for <strong>Firefox</strong>. Here was a browser that all users seemed to get along with happily, with its wealth of built in features, great availability of extensions, security, plug-in availability, it was all thumbs up!</p>
<p>I downloaded the latest version <strong>Mozilla Firefox 1.0.2</strong>, and I never looked back, it was awesome. I enjoyed adding extensions and playing with themes for my shiny new <strong>Firefox</strong>, the community that sprang up around it to support its <strong>Open Source code</strong> are very quick to release updates for new versions too. I used <strong>Firefox </strong>exclusively for over four years, as part of a minority, a community of people who wanted a better browsing experience.</p>
<p>More recently it seems as though <strong>Firefox</strong> has crept into the lead in regards to <a title="W3 reorts on Browser Popularity indicate Firefox is in the lead!" href="http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp" target="_blank">browser popularity</a>, so now we are in the majority! I'd love to say it's official and this is categorical evidence, but it's not. It is however indicative enough for me to want to write a blog on the subject, which I hope is enough to mark the occasion. I believe the most part of <strong>Firefox</strong>'s recent conversion rate success is due to the fact it was endorsed so highly by <strong>Google, </strong>with their <strong>Google Toolbar</strong>, and <strong>Adwords</strong> campaigns. Also the fact it does so well in test such as <a title="Test your browsers rendering ability, then try it in IE..." href="http://acidtests.org/" target="_blank">The Acid tests for browsers</a>. There was also of course "Download Day", to try and take the world record for the most downloads of a new release of software in a single day.</p>
<p>I have been trying out a new browser this last year, <strong>Google Chrome</strong>, it is remarkably simple to use though it's full of complicated components. <a title="LifeHacker's browser testing results, based on cpu usage, load speed and script compatibility" href="http://lifehacker.com/5352195/browser-speed-tests-chrome-40-and-opera-10-take-on-all-challengers" target="_blank">Here is how the latest browsers stand up to rigorous testing</a>! I have always been a big fan of <strong>Google</strong> and their ethos "Don't be evil", and it really shows through browser. I'm looking forward to the time when <strong>Google</strong> release their <strong>Chrome Operating System</strong>, that they've been talking about recently. I have been using <strong>Firefox</strong> as my back up browser though, because it very rarely lets me down!</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.michaelwharton.co.uk%2F2009%2F09%2Ffirefox-pwns-internet-explorer-opinion%2F&amp;linkname=Firefox%20Pwns%20Internet%20Explorer%3A%20Opinion"><img src="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2009/09/firefox-pwns-internet-explorer-opinion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

