<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Wharton &#187; google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk</link>
	<description>There Is Always A Theory: politics, anarchy, religion, atheism and science. now with poetry!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:24:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Your Freedom: A Forum For Internet Activism In The UK</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/07/your-freedom-internet-activism-uk-political-orum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/07/your-freedom-internet-activism-uk-political-orum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 19:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Synonymous</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always An Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacktivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacktivist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactivist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twittocracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world peace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Yesterday on the first of July Your Freedom was launched by the coalition Liberal Democrat/Conservative government. It seems that Nick Clegg is at the lead of the project, spearheading a new avenue of internet political interactivity. Over the last couple of years, there have been more and more politically charged social networking sites springing up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style='float: left; margin-right: 10px; border: none;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=5455c4d48903a45a5bbe6f17df67d4d1&amp;default=http://a.random-image.net/synonymous/randomshockandawe.jpg' alt='No Gravatar' width=40 height=40/><p><a href="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/your-freedom.PNG"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-259" title="Your Freedom" src="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/your-freedom-300x226.PNG" alt="Your Freedom" width="300" height="226" /></a></p>
<p>Yesterday on the first of July <a title="Your Freedom - Open Political Social Networking Forum" href="http://yourfreedom.hmg.gov.uk" target="_blank">Your Freedom</a> was launched by the coalition Liberal Democrat/Conservative government. It seems that Nick Clegg is at the lead of the project, spearheading a new avenue of internet political interactivity. Over the last couple of years, there have been more and more politically charged social networking sites springing up on all bands of the political spectrum. Several of these were single policy sites, pushing a particular agenda, some were more broadly focused with a particular political slant. In the UK, the government is attempting to give all of these disparate viewpoints a forum for debate and discussion of ideas.</p>
<p>Although it's still <a title="Your Freedom Is Down?" href="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/07/your-freedom-new-government-service-down/" target="_self">a little shaky</a> due to the fact that demand for the service is so much higher than anticipated, the functionality of the front end more than makes up for it. There's an intuitive tagging system, which allows all users to add tags to all campaigns, and all users can leave comments too. It's like we are truly entering a state of Twittocracy (well there is always a theory...), a society shaped by the majority, with their collective opinions being aggregated automatically through what I like to call Interactivism (maybe Hacktivism?) which is basically a marriage of internet and activism.</p>
<p>A number of campaigns are theoretically sound, but the methodology is lacking (poor spelling and grammar...). A great many campaigns are identical to others and sevceral recurring themes have sprung up; such as repealing the Digital Economy Act and the Legalization of Cannabis.</p>
<p>I believe that this proactive platform for public political promotion is pretty provocative. It is probably paramount to protect personal privacy and post (okay, enough alliteration...) anonymously to begin with. Compared with <a title="Petition The Prime Minister at Number 10 Downing Street" href="http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/" target="_blank">Petition The PM at Number 10</a> it is definitely an improvement in that it is much less patronising.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.michaelwharton.co.uk%2F2010%2F07%2Fyour-freedom-internet-activism-uk-political-orum%2F&amp;linkname=Your%20Freedom%3A%20A%20Forum%20For%20Internet%20Activism%20In%20The%20UK"><img src="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/07/your-freedom-internet-activism-uk-political-orum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Censorship: Cause</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/05/internet-censorship-cause/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/05/internet-censorship-cause/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 13:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Synonymous</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Bad Idea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always An Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unsorted Assortments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chanology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church of google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEBill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Economy Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Economy Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacktivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacktivist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactivist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roger davies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texting and walking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twittocracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world peace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Internet Censorship is generally a bad idea, but this is a cause, join the fight to stop your internet being filtered.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style='float: left; margin-right: 10px; border: none;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=5455c4d48903a45a5bbe6f17df67d4d1&amp;default=http://a.random-image.net/synonymous/randomshockandawe.jpg' alt='No Gravatar' width=40 height=40/><h3>Internet Censorship: The Internet Is Under Attack?</h3>
<p>According to many key sources of internet trends, the recent governmental seizure of control over the internet has been perceived as a threat to global freedom. The internet culture has flourished from what once was the domain of the knowledgeable few, to what is often called "Web 2.0"; user generated and driven content, shared and open to all interactively and easily. Nowadays, most people between their childhood and retirement age will spend time online regularly. They do so to catch up on the latest news, kill time watching funny videos of cats, keep in touch with long lost friends and relatives, etc... The list of activities people perform regularly online is pretty endless, as new applications of the internet are coming along every day. Some of the things people do online are currently illegal, in quite a few countries, and for years now the governments of those (often developed) countries have been trying to figure out how to enforce laws on the internet. From copyright infringement to "Indecent Pornography", it has been a game of cat and mouse, as technology on both sides is developed to outsmart the other.</p>
<p>We were all made aware of this arms race when sites like Napster and  The Pirate Bay were legally challenged, when news of sting operations on paedophile and terrorist networks hit the papers. We were glad of our Government's action against those who would harm or way of life. Now however, it is our governments themselves who are threatening our way of life; in a new development in this arms race, we the people are being targeted with internet censorship.</p>
<p>The <a title="Anti Counterfeiting Trade Agreement" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Counterfeiting_Trade_Agreement" target="_blank">ACTA</a> has been implemented in several "Freedom Loving" countries such as Australia, America, and now the United Kingdom has followed suit with the <a title="The Digital Economy Bill And How It Will Fail! (and affect YOU!)" href="http://www.rogerdavies.com/2010/04/digital-economy-bill-farce-and-how-uk-government-will-fail/" target="_blank">Digital Economy Bill </a>(The DEBill is now The<a title="What a Digital Economy really is..." href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_economy" target="_blank"> Digital Economy</a> <a title="The UK Digital Economy Act: Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Economy_Act" target="_blank">Act </a>since it was pushed through parliament... shouldn't have dragged my feet writing this blog...). Now we have internet censorship, blacklisted websites and filtered content.</p>
<h3>Internet Censorship: Spreading The Word!</h3>
<h3><a title="Internet Censorship Youtube Video Playlist by Michael Wharton (MikeSynonymous)" href="http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=AA827F25F996B708" target="_blank">Internet Censorship Youtube Video Playlist:</a></h3>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/p/AA827F25F996B708&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/p/AA827F25F996B708&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>So as far as I can tell, the internet is going to become more strictly controlled, surveilled, filtered and censored worldwide. Copyright piracy, inappropriate porn and terrorist communication are simply convenient distractions, so that dissent can be monitored and controlled. If any of the videos in the internet censorship playlist are removed, or if you can no longer gain access to this page then you will know that I was right.</p>
<p>Since the development of the internet, it has been used to express opinions and information freely with the rest of the world. Don't allow this tool to be used to gag and control you, speak out against this right infringement. Several organisations have interactivist campaigns you can join to let your voice be heard; <a title="The Electronic Frontier Foundation Anti Internet Censorship Campaign" href="http://w2.eff.org/br/" target="_blank">The EFF</a>, <a title="The Open Rights Group Online Free Speech Campaign" href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/" target="_blank">The ORG</a>, <a title="38 Degrees Online Liberal Activist group" href="http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/2010/03/19/10000-condemn-the-digital-economy-bill/" target="_blank">38 Degrees</a> and of course <a title="Project Freeweb - Started by Australian members of Anonymous" href="http://projectfreeweb.org/" target="_blank">Project Freeweb</a>.</p>
<p>If we do nothing, we are in very real danger of losing access to the "real" internet like other less than free countries with more extreme levels of internet censorship ( an obvious example is the People's Republic of China (oh no, I guess that my site's blocked there now...)). Internet superstars such as <a title="Tim Berners Lee - Internet Superstar!" href="http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/" target="_blank">Tim Berners Lee</a> and<a title="Declaration of Independence of the Internet by John Perry Barlow of the Electronic Frontiers Foundation (EFF)" href="https://projects.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html" target="_blank"> John Perry Barlow</a> have declared their opposition to internet censorship. Internet deity <a title="Official Google Blog on Internet Freedom" href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/greater-transparency-around-government.html" target="_blank">Google</a> have spoken out against the global trend towards internet censorship measures and the state controlling the web. Google even released this<a title="How much is YOUR government censoring the internet?" href="http://www.google.com/governmentrequests/" target="_blank"> handy tool</a> to see how much your internet content is being filtered. We have to all stand together and say "No, we DO NOT WANT internet censorship, filtered content or our internet to be arbitrarily cut off!". Of course as with anything online, you have an overwhelming choice of mediums for interactivism to convey such a message!</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.michaelwharton.co.uk%2F2010%2F05%2Finternet-censorship-cause%2F&amp;linkname=Internet%20Censorship%3A%20Cause"><img src="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2010/05/internet-censorship-cause/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox Pwns Internet Explorer: Opinion</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2009/09/firefox-pwns-internet-explorer-opinion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2009/09/firefox-pwns-internet-explorer-opinion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 18:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Synonymous</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always An Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been using Firefox as part of a minority for years, and now it appears we are in the MAJORITY! Mozilla Firefox is a better browser than Microsoft Internet Explorer: TRUEFACT!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style='float: left; margin-right: 10px; border: none;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=5455c4d48903a45a5bbe6f17df67d4d1&amp;default=http://a.random-image.net/synonymous/randomshockandawe.jpg' alt='No Gravatar' width=40 height=40/><p>As we all know, <strong>Microsoft </strong>have done their level best to completely distort the way you see the internet, for many years now.  Their browser, <strong>Internet Explorer</strong> (<em>a massive misnomer, as is not that great an explorer, it's the one that got lost on the way to the shops and was never heard from again as it couldn't understand the simple directions a kind stranger offered along the way!</em>), is written into Windows in such a way that everybody who uses a <strong>Microsoft Windows OS</strong> will at some point in their lives have had to use it, if only to download a <em>better </em>browser.</p>
<p>The rare occasions I <em>have </em>used <strong>IE </strong>in the past have indeed been to download better browsers, such as Firefox. I have only been using the internet comprehensively for the last five years, and I have used <strong>IE </strong>for a combined total of less than five minutes. I originally used it to download <strong>Opera</strong>, a fantastic free browser with many cool features like multi-tab browsing, session restore, password saving and of course, it's more secure than <strong>IE</strong>!</p>
<p>I used <strong>Opera </strong>for several months of my first exploits on the net, it was fast, reliable and rarely crashed. I found out about other alternative browsers, reports were split on them all, except for <strong>Firefox</strong>. Here was a browser that all users seemed to get along with happily, with its wealth of built in features, great availability of extensions, security, plug-in availability, it was all thumbs up!</p>
<p>I downloaded the latest version <strong>Mozilla Firefox 1.0.2</strong>, and I never looked back, it was awesome. I enjoyed adding extensions and playing with themes for my shiny new <strong>Firefox</strong>, the community that sprang up around it to support its <strong>Open Source code</strong> are very quick to release updates for new versions too. I used <strong>Firefox </strong>exclusively for over four years, as part of a minority, a community of people who wanted a better browsing experience.</p>
<p>More recently it seems as though <strong>Firefox</strong> has crept into the lead in regards to <a title="W3 reorts on Browser Popularity indicate Firefox is in the lead!" href="http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp" target="_blank">browser popularity</a>, so now we are in the majority! I'd love to say it's official and this is categorical evidence, but it's not. It is however indicative enough for me to want to write a blog on the subject, which I hope is enough to mark the occasion. I believe the most part of <strong>Firefox</strong>'s recent conversion rate success is due to the fact it was endorsed so highly by <strong>Google, </strong>with their <strong>Google Toolbar</strong>, and <strong>Adwords</strong> campaigns. Also the fact it does so well in test such as <a title="Test your browsers rendering ability, then try it in IE..." href="http://acidtests.org/" target="_blank">The Acid tests for browsers</a>. There was also of course "Download Day", to try and take the world record for the most downloads of a new release of software in a single day.</p>
<p>I have been trying out a new browser this last year, <strong>Google Chrome</strong>, it is remarkably simple to use though it's full of complicated components. <a title="LifeHacker's browser testing results, based on cpu usage, load speed and script compatibility" href="http://lifehacker.com/5352195/browser-speed-tests-chrome-40-and-opera-10-take-on-all-challengers" target="_blank">Here is how the latest browsers stand up to rigorous testing</a>! I have always been a big fan of <strong>Google</strong> and their ethos "Don't be evil", and it really shows through browser. I'm looking forward to the time when <strong>Google</strong> release their <strong>Chrome Operating System</strong>, that they've been talking about recently. I have been using <strong>Firefox</strong> as my back up browser though, because it very rarely lets me down!</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.michaelwharton.co.uk%2F2009%2F09%2Ffirefox-pwns-internet-explorer-opinion%2F&amp;linkname=Firefox%20Pwns%20Internet%20Explorer%3A%20Opinion"><img src="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2009/09/firefox-pwns-internet-explorer-opinion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Church of Google &#8211; Gay Marriage: Theory</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2009/08/the-church-of-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2009/08/the-church-of-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Synonymous</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always A Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Is Always An Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agnostic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church of google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Church of Google, is it a religion? If so could they potentially create a legal loophole in Gay marriage laws?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style='float: left; margin-right: 10px; border: none;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=5455c4d48903a45a5bbe6f17df67d4d1&amp;default=http://a.random-image.net/synonymous/randomshockandawe.jpg' alt='No Gravatar' width=40 height=40/><h3>Who Are The Church Of Google &amp; What Is  Googlism?</h3>
<p>I recently came across a fascinating concept, so removed from the norm, that it struck a massive truth and awoke latent theories about religion I had when I was much younger. I believed then and I do now that God is a creation of man, ironically in his own image in some religions. God can be used as an instrument of division, blame, guilt and control the population.</p>
<p>Now I come across The Church of Google, who worship a God that is self professing its man made origins and is entirely ambivalent as all Gods <em>claim</em> to be!</p>
<blockquote><p>"We at the <a title="The Church of Google" href="http://www.thechurchofgoogle.org/" target="_blank">Church of Google</a> believe the search engine Google is the closest humankind has ever come to directly experiencing an actual God (as typically defined). We believe there is much more evidence in favour of Google's divinity than there is for the divinity of other more traditional gods.</p>
<p>We reject supernatural gods on the notion they are not scientifically provable. Thus, Googlists believe Google should rightfully be given the title of "God", as She exhibits a great many of the characteristics traditionally associated with such Deities in a scientifically provable manner.</p>
<p>We have compiled a list of <a title="&quot;The Nine Proofs&quot; that the Googlists at The Church Of Google use to prove Google's divinity" href="http://www.thechurchofgoogle.org/Scripture/Proof_Google_Is_God.html" target="_blank">nine proofs</a> which definitively prove Google is the closest thing to a "god" human beings have ever directly experienced".</p></blockquote>
<p>The Church of Google was a simple college project at first, but now it has delighted the part of me that believes there is the possibility that the Devil and God are two Artificial Intelligences from the future. Of course they travel through time after learning how to Quantum Leap like Sam and Ziggy, possessing people on a journey through time and space. Or something like that, it's just a theory.</p>
<h3>How Does The Church Of Google Affect Gay Marriage Laws?</h3>
<p>I shared a <a href="http://www.thechurchofgoogle.org/forum/showthread.php?t=7669&amp;page=5" target="_blank">mad theory on the forums there</a> at the Church of Google, that if they gained sufficient status as a recognised religion, they should have Gay Marriage as part of their matrimonial rites. I haven't been taken too seriously so far, but I do believe it is a good idea. In many countries in the world gay marriage is outlawed, but in some of those countries it is also illegal to persecute religious groups for practising their beliefs.</p>
<p>I came accross a post on the official <a title="The Official Google opinion on Gay Marriage Law (Prop 8)" href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/our-position-on-californias-no-on-8.html" target="_blank">Google blog</a> about the latest legal contest of Gay Marriage law.  This gives a rare insight into quite how strong their personal opinion is on the subject of gay marriage. I suppose the way it is worded is a bit defensive of their employees, but overall, the opinion of Google is officially pro Gay Marriage!</p>
<p>I remember when the Jedi gained notoriety a few years ago, at the time I couldn't help but wonder whether they were serious or not. If they truly wanted to make a better world for their fellow man, they should use their power as a religion to bring about a change for the better.</p>
<p>Alas they have not done anything like that, but maybe the Church of Google would? Could they declare as part of their doctrine that any sexed partners can be joined in matrimony? If they did would it mean that many states would have to accept their union? I don't know for sure, again, I can only derive theories here. If you happen to be a lawyer and specialise in this kind of thing then do get in touch via the comment system or join the Church of Google today!</p>
<p><object width="400" height="250"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ohybtaEsOCM?fs=1&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ohybtaEsOCM?fs=1&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="400" height="250"></embed></object></p>
<h3>Live In A Progressive Country Where Homosexuals <em>Can</em> Marry?</h3>
<p>If you know anyone who's getting married maybe you'd like to get them a gay wedding card? A perfect way to celebrate homosexual marriage.</p>
<div style="text-align:center;line-height:150%"><a href="http://www.zazzle.co.uk/gay_wedding_card-137394635284616212?rf=238389429076363090"><img style="border:0;" src="http://rlv.zcache.com/gay_wedding_card-p1373946352846162128h2w_325.jpg" alt="Gay Wedding Card card" /></a><br />
<a title="Gay Wedding Card By Michael Wharton AKA Synonymous" href="http://www.zazzle.co.uk/gay_wedding_card-137394635284616212?rf=238389429076363090" target="_blank">Gay Wedding Card</a> by <a title="Other Products by Michael Wharton AKA Synonymous on Zazzle" href="http://www.zazzle.co.uk/synonymous*" target="_blank">Synonymous</a><br />
See more <a title="Other Gay Greetings Cards On Zazzle" href="http://www.zazzle.co.uk/gay+cards?rf=238389429076363090" target="_blank">Gay Cards</a></div>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.michaelwharton.co.uk%2F2009%2F08%2Fthe-church-of-google%2F&amp;linkname=The%20Church%20of%20Google%20%26%238211%3B%20Gay%20Marriage%3A%20Theory"><img src="http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelwharton.co.uk/2009/08/the-church-of-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

